← All use cases

Use case Dealer & rack pricingFuel wholesaler, 180 dealers

How a wholesaler found the dealers its own prices were pushing away.

Every unbranded dealer paid the same margin over rack. Cortex compared each dealer’s street with the stations around it, and found prices costing volume in some markets and leaving margin behind in others.

Dealers squeezed31priced above what their street could bear
Dealers underpriced24margin left behind
Net margin+$510Ka year, with volume up 3%

The difference

Same question. Different results.

The question“Which dealers are we pricing out of their markets, and which can carry more margin?”

Claude / GPT / Public LLMs

Uploaded file

1 sourceThe file you uploadeddealer_margins.xlsx

Answer

Every dealer is priced at the same margin over rack. Volume is down at 31 dealers, so consider allowances for them.

Just an answer.

Cortex AI

Connected intelligence

Cortex AI
  • Dealer street prices
  • Nearby station prices
  • Shared drivers
  • Rack prices
  • Road traffic
  • Volume trends
  • Allowance history
  • Brand presence
  • Local demand
  • Weather
  • 31 dealers 4.1¢ above their street
  • 24 dealers 5.2¢ below everyone
  • 2 branded rivals cutting hard

Answer

Price each dealer for its street. Lower the band for 31 squeezed dealers and raise it 1 to 2 cents for 24 with room. The other 125 are right. +$510K a year.

A decision.

01 · The challenge

One margin over rack, for every dealer, everywhere.

The wholesaler priced every unbranded dealer at the same margin over rack. It was simple to run and easy to explain, but dealers on competitive streets kept asking for allowances, and some quietly started buying elsewhere.

Meanwhile, dealers in markets with little competition paid the same margin as everyone else, even though their pump prices sat comfortably above every station nearby.

  • Dealer volumeDown at a third of dealers
  • Allowance requestsUp every month
  • Dealer street pricesNot tracked
  • InstinctGive allowances to the loudest dealers

02 · The finding

The same margin meant very different things on different streets.

Cortex compared each dealer’s pump prices with the stations that share its drivers, then worked back to what the dealer could pay at the rack and still compete. It added each dealer’s volume trend and allowance history.

The squeezed dealers were concentrated where two branded stations had been cutting hard. The underpriced ones were rural and highway sites with no close competitor.

03 · The decision

Price each dealer for the street it competes on.

  1. Set dealer margins in three bands, reviewed weekly against each dealer’s street.
  2. Replaced ad-hoc allowances for the 31 squeezed dealers with a lower band tied to volume.
  3. Raised the margin 1 to 2 cents for the 24 dealers with room, and gave account managers the street data to explain it.

04 · The impact

What changed.

Dealers priced out of their street314
Ad-hoc allowance requests, per month~40~6
Volume from the 31 squeezed dealers−9%+5%
Network volume—+3%
Net wholesale margin, annualized—+$510K
Leadership takeaway

Your price is your dealer’s cost. Price it for their street.

One margin felt fair. It was fair to our spreadsheet, not to dealers on competitive streets.

A dealer can only sell what the street will take. The wholesaler who prices for that keeps the dealer and the volume.

Do you know which of your dealers your price is squeezing?Book a demoSee all use cases
Next use caseHow a fuel retailer priced fuel to fill the store, not just the tank
See Cortex on your data

Bring your hardest question.
Leave with a decision.

Target implementation2–4 weeks
EnvironmentPrivate enterprise
Timeline depends on data readiness and integrations.

See Cortex AI in Action

What would you like to explore?
We’ll only use your information to make your experience more valuable.